Does transport distance significantly affect timber's carbon advantage?

Transport typically adds 0.01–0.05 kgCO₂e/kg for European timber shipped within the continent (500–2000 km by road/rail/sea). This is a small fraction of the total lifecycle carbon and does not significantly erode timber's advantage over steel or concrete.

Transport typically adds 0.01–0.05 kgCO₂e/kg for European timber shipped within the continent (500–2000 km by road/rail/sea). This is a small fraction of the total lifecycle carbon and does not significantly erode timber's advantage over steel or concrete. Even timber shipped from Scandinavia to Southern Europe maintains a substantial carbon benefit. However, specifying locally sourced timber where available further reduces the transport component.

Why this matters

This question relates to Carbon Footprint of European Timber vs Steel vs Concrete, which covers the broader topic in detail. Understanding this specific aspect helps architects, builders, and timber dealers make informed specification decisions.

For full context and additional technical detail, see our comprehensive guide:

→ Carbon Footprint of European Timber vs Steel vs Concrete

Related questions

• How much CO₂ does timber sequester per cubic metre?
• What is the embodied carbon of structural timber compared to steel?
• Does timber have a lower carbon footprint than concrete?

About this answer

This answer is part of the PuurModulair Knowledge Base — comprehensive timber specification guidance for architects, builders, and dealers across the UK, EU, and Scandinavia.