Which system is fastest to erect on site?

CLT is typically fastest for the structural frame because large panels (up to 3.5 × 16 m) are craned into position and fixed in minutes. A CLT structure can be erected at 1–2 floors per week for a typical residential block.

CLT is typically fastest for the structural frame because large panels (up to 3.5 × 16 m) are craned into position and fixed in minutes. A CLT structure can be erected at 1–2 floors per week for a typical residential block. Timber frame panels (factory-built) are also fast — a house shell can be erected in 1–3 days. Glulam frames are slower due to complex connections but still faster than steel or concrete. All timber systems benefit from dry construction (no curing time) compared to concrete.

Why this matters

This question relates to Timber Frame vs CLT vs Glulam: Structural Comparison for Architects, which covers the broader topic in detail. Understanding this specific aspect helps architects, builders, and timber dealers make informed specification decisions.

For full context and additional technical detail, see our comprehensive guide:

→ Timber Frame vs CLT vs Glulam: Structural Comparison for Architects

Related questions

• What is the difference between timber frame and CLT?
• When should I specify CLT instead of timber frame?
• What spans can glulam achieve compared to CLT and timber frame?

About this answer

This answer is part of the PuurModulair Knowledge Base — comprehensive timber specification guidance for architects, builders, and dealers across the UK, EU, and Scandinavia.